Skip to content

Kelly Bulkeley

Dream Research & Education

  • HOME
  • Areas of Research
    • Psychology and Brain-Mind Science
    • Religion & Spirituality
    • Film & Art
    • Society and Politics
  • Books
    • Lucrecia the Dreamer: Prophecy, Cognitive Science, and the Spanish Inquisition (2018)
    • An Introduction to the Psychology of Dreaming, 2nd Ed
    • Big Dreams: The Science of Dreaming and the Origins of Religion (2016)
    • Lucid Dreaming: New Perspectives on Consciousness in Sleep (2014)
    • Dreaming in the World’s Religions: A Comparative History (2008)
    • Dreaming Beyond Death: A Guide to Pre-Death Dreams and Visions (2005)
    • Children’s Dreams: Understanding the Most Memorable Dreams and Nightmares of Childhood (2012)
  • About
  • Contact
  • Take A Dream Survey

Tag: dream-sharing

Posted on May 31, 2021May 31, 2021

How to Begin a Dream-Sharing Process

When someone is about to share a dream with me, either in a group setting or one-on-one, I always ask for two things. First, please tell the dream in the present tense, not the past tense, so the dream feels immediate, like it’s happening right now. And second, please share the dream twice. After you have told it once, tell the whole thing again.

Most people are fine with the first request. It’s pretty easy to notice the difference between past vs. present tense, and to appreciate the benefits of the latter. Compare “I walked on a beach where birds were flying and saw my friend” with “I walk on a beach where birds are flying and see my friend”—the present tense brings the action of the dream right into the here-and-now, which is a big goal in my way of working with dreams (influenced by Jeremy Taylor and Montague Ullman). If the dream is a terrifying nightmare, it might be more comfortable for the dreamer to use the past tense, to maintain a healthy distance from the anxious feelings. But in almost all other circumstances, the use of the present tense in sharing a dream has enormous benefits in terms of improving the empathetic quality of the ensuing discussion.

The second request is a harder sell. After someone tells me a dream, they are usually eager to hear my response. Especially if the dream is a long and intricate one, the dreamer is probably relieved to have reached the end of the narration. It takes real energy to share a dream in full detail with someone else, a real commitment to personal self-revelation. And what do I say at this moment? “Thanks, now would you please tell it again? From the start?”

Almost always, there’s a brief flash of disappointment when I ask this. The dreamer’s face falls a little bit, and they might even say “Really? You want me to repeat the whole thing?” They don’t say it, but I know they’re thinking, “Hello? Did you not hear the words that were coming out of my mouth?” When I shrug and say I know it seems awkward, but please, I’d appreciate it, the dreamer usually takes a deep breath and starts again, with a slightly put-upon tone of voice, and none of the gusto from the first telling.

And then a few seconds in, their tone of voice changes. We’re back in the dream again, and now the dreamer’s interest in what’s happening grows beyond what arose in the first telling. New features and elements emerge, as the dreamer focuses more on qualities of the experiential space within the dream, and less on making sure to give an accurate narration of the beginning, middle, and end of the dream. By the time the dreamer has finished with the second telling, we are fully immersed in that dream space, and ready for a deeply reflective conversation about its possible meanings.

Telling the dream twice at the outset of a dream-sharing process has at least two specific benefits. First is the surprising appearance of new details. The second telling inevitably differs in various ways from the first telling, and these differences can be a source of fruitful exploration. To be clear, this is not meant to be a “gotcha!” game to challenge the dreamer’s memory. Rather, it’s a way of allowing the dreamer to re-enter the dream space as fully as possible, and thus better able to describe the multi-sensory complexities of that environment.

The second benefit of the re-telling is helping to develop what I think of as a “holistic awareness” of the dream. The first time I hear someone else’s dream, it’s a journey of total surprise and discovery. I have no idea what’s coming next. I’m trying to listen carefully to the dreamer, notice and remember each detail, and keep up with the narration. The second time I hear the dream I already know what’s going to happen, so when the dreamer begins the description, I can now appreciate each detail in the context of the whole. Dreams rarely take the form of simple linear narratives. More often, they have multiple dimensions of activity and awareness, mixing up the conventional elements of story-telling. Things can happen out of chronological order, or in weird patterns of simultaneity. The first telling of the dream inevitably squeezes all of that into a single form, while the second telling enables each detail of the dream to be appreciated within a holistic awareness of the dream in its entirety.

None of this guarantees that important meanings will emerge from the discussion. But if you start a dream-sharing process by following these two principles—tell the dream in the present tense, twice—you will be in the best position to hear whatever potentially valuable meanings the dream may be expressing.

 

Note: this post first appeared in Psychology Today, April 19, 2021.

Posted on August 21, 2019

Empathy and Dream-Sharing: New Research Shows a Connection

Dreams, like good pieces of fiction, can induce empathy about other people’s lives.

What happens in your mind when you share a dream with another person? When they share a dream with you? How does dream-sharing impact or influence the way you think?

Modern psychologists have developed many different models of how dreams are formed and what functions they serve in the brain-mind system. But few researchers have investigated the psychological dynamics of sharing dreams in natural, healthy settings (i.e., not in a clinical or therapeutic context).

This might seem like an insignificant topic. Don’t most people get bored listening to other people’s dreams? Many people never even remember their dreams, let alone talk about them. Isn’t dream-sharing really just an obscure and esoteric practice?

In a survey that Michael Schredl and I analyzed for a recent article in the International Journal of Dream Research, we asked more than five thousand American adults about their attitudes towards dreams. Included in the survey was this question: Do you agree or disagree with the statement “I get bored listening to other people talk about their dreams”? About 8% of the participants strongly agreed with that statement, and another 17% somewhat agreed. So it is fair to say that at least a quarter of the population does not want to be involved in any dream-sharing.

It also fair to say that a larger proportion of people reject that point of view. About 19% of the participants strongly disagreed with the idea that other people’s dreams are boring, and an additional 24% said they somewhat agreed. In the middle were the remaining 31% who neither agreed nor disagreed. Overall, then, 25% of the participants in this survey could be termed “anti-dream-sharing, as opposed to 43% who were “anti-anti-dream-sharing.”

This finding parallels the results of other surveys I have been gathering for several years on the question of how often people talk about their dreams with others. The data are publicly available in the Sleep and Dream Database (SDDb). With a total of more than 11,000 total participants (5,568 females, 5465 males), these are the results:

  • Almost every morning: 3% f, 2% m
  • Several times a week: 9% f, 6% m
  • About once a week: 9% f, 8% m
  • 2 or 3 times a month: 15% f, 10% m
  • Less than once a month: 42% f, 43% m
  • Never: 22% f, 30% m

Although these are responses to a different question, they match up pretty well with the results from the “I get bored” question. About a quarter of the participants say they never talk about their dreams with other people. More than a quarter of the participants (much more for the females) say they talk about their dreams at least several times a month. The largest group talk about their dreams every once in a while—more than never, but less than once a month.

These results indicate that many people are not interested in dream-sharing and never do so. The results also indicate that a large number of people in contemporary American society are interested in talking about their dreams with others, and do so on a fairly regular basis. The existence of people in the former group should not deter us from studying the behaviors of the latter group. Especially when we widen the lens to include anthropological and historical research on dream-sharing in other cultures, this emerges as anything but a trivial or insignificant topic.

This is the broader context in which to welcome the appearance of a pioneering new research paper by Mark Blagrove and his colleagues in a recent issue of Frontiers in Psychology. Titled “Testing the Empathy Theory of Dreaming: The Relationships Between Dream Sharing and Trait and State Empathy,” the paper is co-authored by Sioned Hale, Julia Lockheart, Michelle Carr, Alex Jones, and Katja Valli. The paper presents results from two experiments showing how dream-sharing might have the specific psychological impact of stimulating empathy. Blagrove et al. make four claims in the summary (to which I have added brief parenthetical comments):

“Study 1 found that trait empathy is significantly correlated with frequency of telling dreams to others, frequency of listening to others’ dreams, and positive attitude toward dreaming.”

(This suggests that people who are highly empathetic also tend to be highly interested in dreams.)

“Study 2 found that dream sharing increases empathy in the listener/discusser toward the dream sharer.”

(Listening to another person tell you their dream has the effect of stimulating empathy.)

“We propose that the dream acts as a piece of fiction, which others can explore with the dreamer and that, like literary fiction, can then induce interest in and empathy about the life of the dreamer.”

(This idea enables dream research to connect with theories about the psychological effects of fiction, narrative, and story-telling, which could be a very productive new path to pursue.)

“Increased dream telling across society might decrease differences between countries in levels of empathy and counteract current societal decreases in empathic concern and perspective taking, the main two components of empathy.”

(Here, Blagrove et al. take a daring imaginative leap in suggesting that if we expand practices of dream sharing across social and cultural boundaries, the enhanced capacities for “empathic concern and perspective taking” could help in resolving problems and conflicts at larger scales of collective life.)

Some of these findings, proposals, and future visions will be familiar to people who are already deeply experienced in dream-sharing practices. If you have followed the writings and workshops of people like Jeremy Taylor, Montague Ullman, Robert Bosnak, Clara Hill, and many others over the years, you may have come to these same insights yourself. Blagrove and his colleagues have added a valuable new source of empirical evidence in favor of the positive psychological impact of sharing dreams with other people.

If you’re someone who might locate yourself in the bored by/never talk about dreams category, it’s not too late to try! Sharing dreams helps you expand your empathic awareness and broaden your moral imagination. In most cultures through human history, dream-sharing has been a normal, natural part of life. Thanks to Blagrove et al., we have more reason to appreciate the capacity of dreams to contribute not only to individual well-being but to collective health as well.

####

Full citation: “Testing the Empathy Theory of Dreaming: The Relationships Between Dream Sharing and Trait and State Empathy,” Mark Blagrove, Sioned Hale, Julia Lockheart, Michelle Carr, Alex Jones, and Katja Valli, in Frontiers in Psychology (2019) 10:1351.

This essay first appeared as a post in Psychology Today, August 7, 2019.

Posted on August 31, 2018

Should You Talk About Dreams at Work?

Yes, but only if you’re very careful.

Let’s say you just had a vivid dream about something at work. The dream was really intense, and you can’t get it out of your mind.  Would it be appropriate to tell other people at work about the dream?

I’m guessing that most human resources professionals would say no, it would not be appropriate to talk about a dream at work, for several reasons.  Such conversations could easily lead people to reveal personal life details, either intentionally or unintentionally, that make other co-workers uncomfortable.  There is no established model for interpreting dreams, so the discussion is likely to become confusing and divisive. Especially if the dreams lead into bizarre, taboo territory around sex and/or aggression, they have no business being discussed in the workplace.  At a time when people are losing their jobs because of inadvertently offensive comments to others, talking about dreams at work seems like an unacceptably risky thing to do.

And yet… People who work closely together are in fact dreaming of their jobs and each other, sometimes with great frequency.  Psychologists have found that dreams are like a mirror of the mind, accurately reflecting our emotional concerns in waking life.  For many people today, their jobs are a source of intense emotional concern.

Psychologists have also found that dreams can be a powerful engine of new creative insights.  Particularly when people feel uncertain or stuck in their waking lives, their dreaming minds bring forth new possibilities and alternative perspectives that can respond more adaptively to the challenges of the current situation.

So this is where we stand: We know that people are frequently dreaming about work, and we know that some of those dreams offer potentially innovative insights about work-related challenges.  Yet none of this can be acknowledged in the workplace as it currently exists.

I sympathize with the worries of HR managers.  But it’s important to recognize that if a way could be found to safely share dreams in the workplace, it would be enormously helpful for both employees and their companies. 

The path from here to there has many obstacles, but none are insurmountable.  A few basic principles, agreed upon by all, can set the stage for safe and effective dream-sharing in the workplace.

The key is to focus only on dreams with direct relevance to a work-related issue.  Bracket out the personal details as much as possible, and consider only what the dreams might be saying about a challenge or problem at work.  The goal is to stimulate new thinking and new ideas for collective problem-solving.  This can lead in a variety of different directions, and that’s fine.  The discussion does not need to produce a single definitive interpretation of the dream in order to serve the valuable function of expanding and energizing people’s creative efforts.

For the process to flow smoothly, everyone must respect the dreamer and avoid imposing external interpretations on the dreams.  The truth is, we can never know for sure what another person’s dream means; we only have direct access to our own dreams.  However, if invited to do so, we can offer suggestions from our perspective about the possible meanings in a co-worker’s dream.  In the ensuing conversation everyone can gain a deeper, more nuanced view of the work-related situation.

Of course, all of this depends on a high degree of mutual trust and shared confidentiality among employees.  That might sound impossible in the world of modern commerce, but many companies have mission statements and principles of conduct that emphasize similar virtues, so it should not require extraordinary measures to enable dream discussions.  Just people agreeing to treat each other with respect and decency.

How would this look in actual practice?  Informal conversations among friends are the most common setting for sharing dreams about work; those conversations should be allowed and encouraged.  Spontaneously mentioning a dream during a meeting may, or may not, be helpful; it’s probably a bad idea unless you have given advance notice to the other participants.  I don’t think I would ever put anything in writing about my dreams in a business setting; all of this should remain within the realm of verbal discussions among colleagues.

The ideal setting for sharing dreams at work would be during retreats and brainstorming sessions, when employees gather to venture outside the box, think up new ideas, generate innovative solutions to current challenges, and imagine better visions of the future.  These are precisely the kinds of things the dreaming mind is doing every night.  It really should not be a daunting prospect to include discussions of dreaming in work sessions devoted to open-ended planning, visioning, and problem-solving.

(Fun fact: during dreams in the REM phase of sleep, the brain is generating as much or more neuro-electrical energy as it does when we are wide awake. Brainstorming indeed!)

Dreams are an incredibly fertile source for creative thought, for trying to go beyond what is to imagine what might be.  Any company, institution, or enterprise that aspires to grow and expand into the future should consider finding appropriate ways to make use of this free and natural resource, which truly represents a profound expression of the collective intelligence of the work force.

 

Note: this post first appeared in Psychology Today, August 29, 2018.

Recent Posts

  • Threat Simulations in War Dreams
  • Basketball Diary #5: The Court of Greg Brown III
  • The Essence of a Dream Library
  • Basketball Dream Diary #4: My Blazers Hat
  • The Jumbotron Critique of Lucid Dreaming

Archives

Ⓒ 2022 KellyBulkeley.org
Proudly powered by WordPress